6 Comments

A well versed meeting between two good minds, thank you

Expand full comment

Thanks Ben

Expand full comment

Excellent plainly written and - most importantly - understandable. Many thanks.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

Expand full comment

Excellent interview! A few observations...

“Core issues that matter to the controllers are successfully advanced by marketing them differently to each group. When the blue team is in power, the digital ID agenda is sold as a way to control ‘hate speech’. When the red team is in power, it’s sold as a way to control illegal immigrants. Digital ID gets advanced no matter who’s in the driving seat.” — I like to think in the metaphorical terms of individuals walking. While their steps alternate between left and right, both left and right propel them to the same place.

“If you accept my earlier argument (in question 3 above) that government is a criminal enterprise, then its penchant for force-medicating us with fluoride instead of Vitamin D should tell you everything you need to know about the claimed benefits of fluoride!” — Darn tootin!

“I wonder what science religionists would have to say about John Ioannides’ 2005 scientific (!) study which proved that most claimed research findings are false. Would they accept that they are worshipping a false idol?” — They'd pretend the study doesn't exist.

Expand full comment

I have cut and pasted the left-right walking analogy to a file called "stuff to plagiarise". Thanks!

Expand full comment