The objective of this series of articles is to shed light on what disclosures the UK government has made on sun-dimming geoengineering, why it thinks it can engage in this madness without public permission, and what scope there is for any legal challenges to it.
“the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero” — How stunningly Monty Pythonesque and oxymoronic! I had to search-engine it to make sure I wasn't being Babylon-Bee'd.
A quick note on “ocean acidification”, which is mentioned. As one of the globalist fearmongering talking points, it's never brought up that the oceans are in fact a “base”. Its pH is slightly over 8, on scale that runs from 0 (strongly acidic) to 14 (strongly basic); a scale where a pH of 7 is neutral and represents the pH (power of hydrogen) of water (H2O). This of course, is never explained or understood since, as with the CO2 demonization operation, real/actual/uncorrupted science and data are antithetical to the narrative(s) being pushed by the techno-psychopathocracy.
Key points, beautifully put: “The understanding behind the commissioning of geoengineering modelling studies is that they must support the overall industry’s doctrine by justifying actions to mitigate the supposed anthropogenic warming.”
… and this: “Complex deceptions require careful management and, if it’s going to be bungled, it should be bungled professionally by people with lots of letters after their names and, crucially, receiving large salaries paid by you and me. Coating the medicine with an expensive layer of middle- and upper-class toffery is what makes it go down.”
… and this: “The production of carbon is at the core of everything we do as individuals and societally. And since carbon has been declared an evil, everything you do must be rationed, monitored and controlled to keep this evil in check. Once you’ve done some elementary dot-joining, you are bound to conclude that you are the evil to be kept in check, which is diabolically ingenious of our totalitarian overlords.”
It has taken a relatively long time for the aware and critically thinking public to penetrate the euphemisms our communications media use to obfuscate the truth behind the gaslighting and manipulations populations have undergone for many decades. Following on from the incredibly terrifying deception foist upon us during the so-called pandemic many of us have come into full consciousness and realise the carbon neutral crap is a politically correct, unimpressive way to let us know we are the carbon the vested interests want to be rid of. They always have to "tell" us before they act to off-set their karmic outcomes. Simples!
I’ve only started to scrape the surface of the psychopaths’ MO and how they communicate their intentions. Telling us about their ludicrous schemes is their way of getting consent. “We’re going to do this to you. Any objections?” Or in the case of spraying: “We ARE doing this to you. Any objections?”
They're not as blatant as that! There have many ways of informing us and their intentions are often displayed in films, books years before the event occurs. Fear is taken as consent, there are things you can do to offset inadvertent consenting to their dangerous nonsense, such as stating very firmly "I know what you're doing, I refuse consent! Now fuck off!" You can be rid of intrusive low vibe thoughts by catching them before they grow into misery and stating "Stop! Cancel! Clear! Reset!" Cynics and black pillers on social media who are pests are mostly unaware of what they're achieving so you can respond with "Not on my timeline!" Rebuke the miserable doomsayers! You have the Power, they only have power.
Yes, this is exactly the communication style. It is SO far away from normal human behaviour - while recognisable as part of highly psychopathic behaviour - that most people just don't see it.
I think you may be referring to a recent article by the BBC on solar radiation management. This alone set off alarm bells for me, as it follows a pattern I've observed in the mainstream media since 2020. As a journalist who's written for many of the outlets in question, I've studied the editorial thinking behind what they run and so was able to see the shift clearly. Basically it goes like this:
- pick something many of the public are noticing or talking about, such as Covid vaccines or 15 minute cities
- label those people conspiracy theorists or far-right and discredit their concerns
- THEN re-assert the initial topic in terms which fits the narrative or, in the case of the BBC article on SRM, say 'well, wouldn't it be a good idea if it DID happen'?
This is a way of trying to gain public acceptance for the idea. They know the cat is out of the bag in terms of the numbers of people observing the skies and becoming concerned about the weather. So the only way they'll be able to continue longterm is if people are persuaded to accept SRM as a necessary measure in the face of Climate, like the vaccines was in the face of Covid. It's psychological manipulation on a mass scale - aka Fifth Generation Warfare.
As always, over the target.
“the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero” — How stunningly Monty Pythonesque and oxymoronic! I had to search-engine it to make sure I wasn't being Babylon-Bee'd.
A quick note on “ocean acidification”, which is mentioned. As one of the globalist fearmongering talking points, it's never brought up that the oceans are in fact a “base”. Its pH is slightly over 8, on scale that runs from 0 (strongly acidic) to 14 (strongly basic); a scale where a pH of 7 is neutral and represents the pH (power of hydrogen) of water (H2O). This of course, is never explained or understood since, as with the CO2 demonization operation, real/actual/uncorrupted science and data are antithetical to the narrative(s) being pushed by the techno-psychopathocracy.
Key points, beautifully put: “The understanding behind the commissioning of geoengineering modelling studies is that they must support the overall industry’s doctrine by justifying actions to mitigate the supposed anthropogenic warming.”
… and this: “Complex deceptions require careful management and, if it’s going to be bungled, it should be bungled professionally by people with lots of letters after their names and, crucially, receiving large salaries paid by you and me. Coating the medicine with an expensive layer of middle- and upper-class toffery is what makes it go down.”
… and this: “The production of carbon is at the core of everything we do as individuals and societally. And since carbon has been declared an evil, everything you do must be rationed, monitored and controlled to keep this evil in check. Once you’ve done some elementary dot-joining, you are bound to conclude that you are the evil to be kept in check, which is diabolically ingenious of our totalitarian overlords.”
Yep, DESNZ is very real. That's what happens when you try to make something incredibly stupid sound clever.
It has taken a relatively long time for the aware and critically thinking public to penetrate the euphemisms our communications media use to obfuscate the truth behind the gaslighting and manipulations populations have undergone for many decades. Following on from the incredibly terrifying deception foist upon us during the so-called pandemic many of us have come into full consciousness and realise the carbon neutral crap is a politically correct, unimpressive way to let us know we are the carbon the vested interests want to be rid of. They always have to "tell" us before they act to off-set their karmic outcomes. Simples!
I’ve only started to scrape the surface of the psychopaths’ MO and how they communicate their intentions. Telling us about their ludicrous schemes is their way of getting consent. “We’re going to do this to you. Any objections?” Or in the case of spraying: “We ARE doing this to you. Any objections?”
They're not as blatant as that! There have many ways of informing us and their intentions are often displayed in films, books years before the event occurs. Fear is taken as consent, there are things you can do to offset inadvertent consenting to their dangerous nonsense, such as stating very firmly "I know what you're doing, I refuse consent! Now fuck off!" You can be rid of intrusive low vibe thoughts by catching them before they grow into misery and stating "Stop! Cancel! Clear! Reset!" Cynics and black pillers on social media who are pests are mostly unaware of what they're achieving so you can respond with "Not on my timeline!" Rebuke the miserable doomsayers! You have the Power, they only have power.
Yes, this is exactly the communication style. It is SO far away from normal human behaviour - while recognisable as part of highly psychopathic behaviour - that most people just don't see it.
I think you may be referring to a recent article by the BBC on solar radiation management. This alone set off alarm bells for me, as it follows a pattern I've observed in the mainstream media since 2020. As a journalist who's written for many of the outlets in question, I've studied the editorial thinking behind what they run and so was able to see the shift clearly. Basically it goes like this:
- pick something many of the public are noticing or talking about, such as Covid vaccines or 15 minute cities
- label those people conspiracy theorists or far-right and discredit their concerns
- THEN re-assert the initial topic in terms which fits the narrative or, in the case of the BBC article on SRM, say 'well, wouldn't it be a good idea if it DID happen'?
This is a way of trying to gain public acceptance for the idea. They know the cat is out of the bag in terms of the numbers of people observing the skies and becoming concerned about the weather. So the only way they'll be able to continue longterm is if people are persuaded to accept SRM as a necessary measure in the face of Climate, like the vaccines was in the face of Covid. It's psychological manipulation on a mass scale - aka Fifth Generation Warfare.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c98qp79gj4no
Great observation. I am very inclined to use this in Part III where I address the gaslighting, crediting you of course, if you're ok with that.
Absolutely, please go ahead. Keen to help shine a light on the dynamics of the information operations ...